• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Research in Oncology
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 20 (2024)
Volume Volume 19 (2023)
Volume Volume 18 (2022)
Volume Volume 17 (2021)
Volume Volume 16 (2020)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 15 (2019)
Volume Volume 14 (2018)
Volume Volume 13 (2017)
Volume Volume 12 (2016)
Gamal, N., Shohdy, K. (2020). How Adequate is the Adequate Kidney Function for Clinical Trial Enrollment of Novel Anticancer Drugs?. Research in Oncology, 16(2), 31-34. doi: 10.21608/resoncol.2020.33223.1100
Nehal Gamal; Kyrillus S. Shohdy. "How Adequate is the Adequate Kidney Function for Clinical Trial Enrollment of Novel Anticancer Drugs?". Research in Oncology, 16, 2, 2020, 31-34. doi: 10.21608/resoncol.2020.33223.1100
Gamal, N., Shohdy, K. (2020). 'How Adequate is the Adequate Kidney Function for Clinical Trial Enrollment of Novel Anticancer Drugs?', Research in Oncology, 16(2), pp. 31-34. doi: 10.21608/resoncol.2020.33223.1100
Gamal, N., Shohdy, K. How Adequate is the Adequate Kidney Function for Clinical Trial Enrollment of Novel Anticancer Drugs?. Research in Oncology, 2020; 16(2): 31-34. doi: 10.21608/resoncol.2020.33223.1100

How Adequate is the Adequate Kidney Function for Clinical Trial Enrollment of Novel Anticancer Drugs?

Article 1, Volume 16, Issue 2, December 2020, Page 31-34  XML PDF (68.84 K)
Document Type: Mini Review
DOI: 10.21608/resoncol.2020.33223.1100
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Nehal Gamal1; Kyrillus S. Shohdy email orcid 2
1Medical Student, Kasr Al-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
2Hematology and Medical Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
Abstract
Excessively restrictive eligibility criteria hinder the enrollment of cancer patients to clinical trials. Those patients are supposed to represent the range of characteristics of the overall population with particular cancer. This, in turn, affects the generalizability of results and efficiency of the drug development process in oncology. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend broadening the eligibility criteria for early and late phase trials. A clearly defined rationale is essential for excluding patients. They selected specific items that commonly lead to the exclusion of patients from clinical trials, namely brain metastases, the minimum age for enrollment, human immunodeficiency virus infection, prior and concurrent malignancies, and organ dysfunction. We reviewed the clinical trials of abemaciclib and tucatinib, two novel anticancer agents, to investigate the eligibility criteria used in their ongoing trials and how the cut-offs for adequate kidney functions were defined. We provided recommendations to allow for enrollment of otherwise eligible patients.
Keywords
Abemaciclib; Clinical trials; Eligibility criteria; Kidney function; Tucatinib
Statistics
Article View: 690
PDF Download: 875
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.